How I took a therapist’s dated website from research to redesign: five interviews, four competitors, nine insights, and a new site that puts booking one tap away.

Zoe Folts is a local therapist with more than 20 years of experience. Her site, zoefolts.com, had all the right information, but it was built like it was from another decade: a dark maroon frame, a stock compass banner, and a sidebar of ten-plus links where booking was just one item in the list.
My task was a full redesign with one hard rule: keep her content. So the work was all structure and visual design: reorganize what she already had so it felt calm, clear and easy to act on.

The proposal: make the site more inviting, easier to navigate and true to Zoe’s therapeutic approach, so that booking a free consultation is the easiest thing to do from anywhere.
I compared four therapy practice sites side by side: each one’s value proposition, strengths, weaknesses and what they all had in common. With therapy, the site and the person are hard to separate, so I looked past layout at how well each one conveyed the therapist herself.
The strongest sites felt like one voice: color, wording, logo and photos all working together.
Easy booking from any page, and a clear focus on the therapist’s top three priorities.
Sites with a photo and a sense of the therapist’s personality felt far more trustworthy.
Free resources signaled real concern for people’s mental health, beyond selling a service.
I interviewed five people who have been in therapy about how they found and booked their therapist, and whether a website played a part. Three quotes stuck with me:
“I went to her website and just called her immediately, just because that seemed easiest.”
“I like to see a picture of them before booking an appointment so I can see who I’m speaking to.”
“A website is important to me, it shows they can keep up with the times and are aware of today’s world.”
I sorted everything from the interviews into pain points, features to include and shared trends. Nine insights came out of it, and they shaped every decision that followed.
People start therapy for a specific reason, so the site should speak to targeted needs.
Users want to know the therapist’s methods and style.
Many prefer a therapist of the same gender for comfort.
Information overload caused confusion. Keep it clear and concise.
The site should feel like the therapist’s personality.
Most people want to see a photo before they book.
Booking a session should be the main, easiest action.
People want to know right away if insurance is accepted.
Many prefer to book the first appointment with a call and hear the therapist’s voice.
From the interviews and affinity map I built Chrissy, the person this redesign had to work for.
Just moved for a demanding new job, has great insurance and no community yet. A friend suggested she find a therapist.
Before designing anything, I mapped Zoe’s business goals, users’ goals and technical considerations to find what all three shared.
Attract people looking for a good fit, show Zoe’s personality and style, get them to book or call.
Find a matching therapist, see who she is, book easily, and find a phone number and email fast.
Organized and user-friendly, a photo of the therapist, booking and contact on every page.
Because this was a redesign, the priorities mostly stayed the same. The one big call was to de-prioritize Zoe’s long list of outside links: it mattered to her, but research showed it wasn’t what people came for, so it moved behind the menu.
Everything on the site funnels to two actions: book a free consultation or contact Zoe. Since the links were moving behind the menu, I mapped two ways to reach them and planned to test both.
I started with quick paper sketches of the homepage, services, about, location and contact screens. The homepage held everything, with consultation and contact up top and a hamburger menu for individual sections.
Early testers found the flow intuitive and enjoyable, so I moved into high-fidelity frames in Figma: a soft peach-and-navy palette, a calm topographic texture, Zoe’s photo front and center, and her own words broken into easy pieces.


Every tester got through both tasks easily. The feedback was about comfort, not confusion: one tester found the site wordy, and scrolling one long page felt clunky on a phone.
Tests the booking feature and getting back home.
Tests whether both paths in the navigation make sense.
Two iterations came straight out of testing.
On laptop, one long homepage with jump links works fine. On a phone it felt cumbersome, so I kept a complete homepage and moved each section to its own page behind the hamburger menu.
A tester found the paragraphs long, so I split them into smaller, digestible pieces and added design elements between them.
“Seeing my client derive joy from the end result was truly rewarding.”
Redesigning someone else’s site is different from inventing an app from scratch: the job is to bring their vision to life, not mine. Working closely with a therapist deepened my appreciation for collaborative design, where turning someone’s vision into a real digital experience makes a meaningful difference.